Review of Protocol Databases
Title: 1. iProtocol
URL: 1. http://iprotocol.mit.edu/aboutus.asp
2. http://www.interscience.wiley.com/c_p/index.htm
Date Reviewed: 05/24/04
Description: Both sites are searchable
databases containing hundreds of protocols for techniques ranging from common
to unique assays. IProtocol appears
to be newer, with less total protocols, and more specific topics. Current Protocols Online has a much
broader range of protocols throughout 12 different scientific disciplines.
Strengths: iProtocol: easy navigation, very detailed descriptions, option to
submit your own protocols and review others, FREE, discussion forums available
for further questions on techniques
Current Protocols Online:
many,
many more protocols stored here, easy searching and navigation, basically the
online version of the multiple volume books, very detailed protocols with
references
Weaknesses: iProtocol: The site seems less
frequently visited, with many areas that look untouched since 1999-2000. It has the potential of being a good
site once more people are exposed to it.
Search options are still too broad it could be improved with a more
advanced search engine.
Current Protocols
Online: Can be somewhat overwhelming when you
arenšt quite sure what you are looking for. Many different protocols could fall under multiple topics,
and sometimes searching might not lead you directly to the right protocol.
Comprehensiveness: Pretty simple to understand.
Timeliness: Current Protocols Online seems
to be updated and used much more frequently than iProtocol, but both seem up to
current date.
Ease of Use: Easy.
Responsiveness: Quick downloading as long as you have good internet service
and a good computer.
Overall Evaluation: iProtocol: 3
stars! Current Protocols Online:
4.5 stars!
Reviewer: Rebekah Stackpole
Email: Rebekah.Stackpole@tufts.edu